Which nation continued to be ruled




















But what if the English explorers had never come to Indian shores or failed to conquer the peninsula? What would India have been like now? These are just some amateur predictions of the future of the sub-continent, and were inspired by inputs from Quora. You are most welcome to have your own theories on it.

The British rule may have united India, but in their absence, the result is the presence of princely states that co-exist as rivals or alliances.

The big boys in this political set up would probably be the Sikh rulers in the north west, the Marathas in western and central India, and the Mysore Kingdom of Tipu Sultan. The Mughals survived as a puppet state under the East India Company.

However given the circumstances of this story, their power is rapidly declining with weak rulers and the borders of their territories recede towards Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. The rulers of Kashmir, Punjab and the Rajputs pose an imminent threat to the once powerful empire.

In the absence of the British and their powerful navy, other European colonial powers enter the waters of Asia. In accordance with actual history, the Portuguese and the French occupy Goa and Pondicherry respectively.

With no other worthy opponents, their rivals are the Spanish who occupy the Philippines and the Dutch who have established plantations in Indonesia. The Portuguese would try to expand further into India. However, they are not as enterprising as the British, and being a trade link between Europe and India is their only interest.

The French Revolution in affects the French territories as their coffers are empty in funding the war back home. This weakens French influence, leaving them vulnerable should there be any conflict with the Portuguese or Indian kingdoms. The British colonies were strong in the Americas, Africa and Australia. With India not being a part of their territory, perhaps they would have put their best interests in these lands and managed to suppress the American Revolution.

The British introduced the railways in , but given their absence, the emergence of railways would probably come about much later in the 20th century and would not have covered every part of the country. Perhaps the rail routes would exist from industrial areas that produce raw materials thereby increasing efficiency in transport towards cities and ports.

The pioneers of railways would probably be the stronger and more westernised kingdoms like Baroda, Mysore, Hyderabad and Punjab in collaboration with western powers like the Portuguese and Dutch. The popularity of regional languages and differences in religion and caste would spur wars and rebellions in various kingdoms which could probably lead to the reduction of their size. The English allied with the Iroquois Confederacy, while the Algonquian-speaking tribes joined forces with the French and the Spanish.

The English won the war, and claimed all of the land east of the Mississippi River. The English-allied Native Americans were given part of that land, which they hoped would end European expansion —but unfortunately only delayed it.

Europeans continued to enter the country following the French and Indian War, and they continued their aggression against Native Americans. Another consequence of allying with Europeans was that Native Americans were often fighting neighboring tribes. This caused rifts that kept some Native American tribes from working together to stop European takeover.

European settlers brought these new diseases with them when they settled, and the illnesses decimated the Native Americans—by some estimates killing as much as 90 percent of their population. Though many epidemics happened prior to the colonial era in the s, several large epidemics occurred in the 17th and 18th centuries among various Native American populations. With the population sick and decreasing, it became more and more difficult to mount an opposition to European expansion.

Another aspect of the colonial era that made the Native Americans vulnerable was the slave trade. As a result of the wars between the European nations, Native Americans allied with the losing side were often indentured or enslaved.

There were even Native Americans shipped out of colonies like South Carolina into slavery in other places, like Canada. These problems that arose for the Native Americans would only get worse in the 19th century, leading to greater confinement and the extermination of native people.

The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.

Tyson Brown, National Geographic Society. National Geographic Society. For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher.

Yet in doing so, these authors affirmed ties that bound the two nations together. The depictions of this bond are so convincing that even today their imagery colors our reconstructions of the biblical past. Beth Alpert Nakhai, "Divided Monarchy", n. Her research interests include archaeology, biblical studies, Canaanite and Israelite religion, Israel in antiquity, and the lives of women in Israel and the ancient Near East.

According to the Bible, the house of David ruled the southern kingdom of Judah for several centuries, and extrabiblical evidence appears to confirm this designation for the monarchy of Judah. According to the Bible, King David reigned over a large territory and his son Solomon over an even larger one.

After the death of King Solomon, the kingdom was divided in two. The period from the late 10th through the early sixth centuries B. A system of rule with a monarch as its head; or the hereditary system passed from one monarch to another.

Related to the religious beliefs connected to Deuteronomy, which emphasized monotheism, the Jerusalem temple, observance of the Law, and the destruction of idolatry. Hebrew is regarded as the spoken language of ancient Israel but is largely replaced by Aramaic in the Persian period. The set of Biblical books shared by Jews and Christians.

A more neutral alternative to "Old Testament. Relating to or associated with people living in the territory of the northern kingdom of Israel during the divided monarchy, or more broadly describing the biblical descendants of Jacob. Following to the biblical text, the period of Israelite history in the 10th century B.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000