Why lawyer wig

In the legal profession, the importance of dress codes and robes are indispensable. Dress codes form a significant aspect of any occupation. They symbolize responsibility, solidarity, and discipline. When it comes to legal practice, the prevalence of dress codes can be found throughout history. The practice of law itself demands the exhibition of certain virtues.

Dress codes can be considered as a form of representation of such virtues. Throughout times there have been significant changes all around the globe when it comes to the enforcement of dress codes for lawyers. However, there are certain countries like the United Kingdom that still follow the custom of lawyers wearing wigs in trials and courts. The legal system in India is largely derived from the judicial structure of courts in Britain.

In Britain, it was customary for lawyers and judges to wear black gowns, white neckbands, and grey wigs. This tradition can be traced back to a few centuries ago in the UK. Wearing a headgear of some sort has been a prevalent practice, in the legal profession in the UK even before the introduction of wigs.

In the late 17 th century, wearing wigs became a common practice in law. Apart from that, the fashion of those times also influenced the adoption of wigs as a part of the costume for advocates. Wigs were a symbol of power and dignity, and it was used to distinguish lawyers from people belonging to other sections of society.

Wigs and their introduction in the judicial and legal systems can also be attributed to the French. Judges stopped wearing wigs around the same time everyone else stopped wearing wigs to formal occasions. The main reason is tradition. A band is a form of formal neckwear which is worn by some clergy or lawyers, with some forms of academic dress.

They can be in the form of two rectangle pieces of cloth, usually in white, which is tied to the neck. Bands are normally plural because they need two similar parts and it did not come as one piece of cloth. Wigs were a symbol of power and dignity, and it was used to distinguish lawyers from people belonging to other sections of society. Wigs and their introduction in the judicial and legal systems can also be attributed to the French. The legal system in India is largely derived from the judicial structure of courts in Britain.

In Britain, it was customary for lawyers and judges to wear black gowns, white neckbands, and grey wigs. This tradition can be traced back to a few centuries ago in the UK. So now, until further notice, the Supreme Court is relaxing its dress requirements. Male lawyers may appear wearing a white shirt and white neck-band. Similarly, women may wear white sarees or salwar-kameezes and the neck-band.

But bear in mind, Sri Lankan judges and lawyers still wear wigs on ceremonial occasions. Dress code is a symbol of confidence, discipline and profession so as Lawyers dress code. Wearing of gown started as a symbol of mourning in England. It was then that uniform for lawyers was designated. Wigs were inspired from the court of King Charles II, despite going out of fashion was worn to distinguish legal professionals.

Dress Codes for Female Lawyers A blazer or suit jacket is typically a must in most law firms, whether you wear pants or a skirt. Skirts are perfectly acceptable for female lawyers, as long as the skirt conforms to a certain style. Male lawyers generally favor dark-colored two-piece suits, which should be properly fitted, cleaned, and pressed, with a tie, a white or light- colored shirt, and dress shoes. But wigs and robes are still to be used in criminal trials. Most common wealth countries still entertain the wearing of wigs and gowns in their courts.

Nigeria is a case study. In Nigeria, all the lawyers and judges still wear wigs during proceedings; however, this is dependent on the court they are appearing in. For instance, in the magistrates courts, lawyers are not required to appear on wigs and gowns while pursuing a suit.

But the full robe of wig and gown is required in other courts starting from the high court upwards. Differences between common law and equitable law. Differences between Cross-offers and counter-offers. Differences between offer and invitation to treat.

In Africa, it is almost half a century since the colonialists left; however, it seems that they left their wigs behind.

Wigs as worn by lawyers and judges are not indigenous to the African community, thus they are seen as a continuation of the relics of colonialism. Many writers have lamented that it is appalling to see one of the most enlightened institutions still following the footsteps of the colonialists even at a period where Africa is seeking emancipation from colonial influences in many areas.

Wigs have also been criticized on the ground that it makes for the discomfort of the person wearing it. Africa as a continent has cases of high temperature; it is unreasonable and unbecoming for a lawyer or a judge to wear wigs in such temperatures in the name that it befits the profession. Some legal practitioners are so untidy in their approach to the profession that it becomes an eye saw to see the robes.

The most dreaded part of it is that the so called wig is white in color and shows when it is not properly taken care of.